For oil, the advice points to a prolonged standoff rather than a resolution. That keeps Iranian supply constrained with no near-term prospect of a deal returning barrels to the market. The “no war” element in principle limits the tail risk of a full-scale conflict that could disrupt shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. However, today’s reports of blasts on Qeshm Island and claims of limited US strikes show that low-level military friction is continuing. Ratcliffe’s view that economic pain could trigger internal unrest adds a further, harder-to-price risk, since instability inside Iran could itself threaten production and exports. The net effect is likely to keep a geopolitical risk premium embedded in crude rather than build or remove it sharply.
–
Earlier:
Up to six blasts reported near Iran’s Qeshm Island as Israeli TV cites US strike
–
The CIA director is reportedly advising Trump to let economic pressure do the work on Iran, betting that sustained pain will bring either concessions or upheaval.
Summary:
CIA Director John Ratcliffe is advising President Donald Trump to maintain a “no war, no deal” approach toward Iran, according to sources cited by Axios
Ratcliffe favors letting the economic pressure campaign against Iran continue
He has told Trump that prolonged economic pain will push Iran toward further concessions
Alternatively, he argues, it could create enough instability inside Iran to prompt a popular revolt
The report comes the same day as unconfirmed accounts of explosions on Iran’s Qeshm Island and a reported US strike on an air defense system there
CIA Director John Ratcliffe is advising President Donald Trump to keep the current “no war, no deal” approach toward Iran and allow economic pressure on Tehran to continue, according to sources cited by Axios reporter Barak Ravid.
Ratcliffe has told Trump that sustained economic pain will lead Iran to offer more concessions, the report said. Alternatively, he believes it could generate enough instability inside the country to prompt citizens to revolt. The position amounts to advice to the president rather than a confirmed policy decision, and there was no indication in the report of how Trump has responded.
The approach would mean neither escalating to a wider military campaign nor pursuing a negotiated settlement. Instead, Washington would rely on the pressure already in place to shift Tehran’s position over time.
The report comes amid fresh tension in the Gulf. Earlier on Monday, Iranian state news agency IRNA reported several explosions on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz, saying the cause was unclear. Israeli broadcaster N12 reported that a US strike had hit an air defense system on the island. It described the strike as part of limited operations carried out by the US in recent weeks without formal announcement. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps also claimed to have shot down a US drone over the strait. None of those reports has been officially confirmed.
Taken together, the accounts suggest the “no war” status quo is not free of military friction, even if it stops short of open conflict.
For energy markets, the advice points to an extended standoff rather than a near-term breakthrough. The key questions are whether Trump adopts Ratcliffe’s recommendation and how Tehran responds to continued pressure, whether through concessions, escalation around the Strait of Hormuz or growing strain at home.
This article was written by Eamonn Sheridan at investinglive.com.
