U.S. AI debate masks rivals’ ‘negligence’: Mistral CEO

The debate that we've seen in in the US has been a cover for the negligence of some of our competitors. Uh it is absolutely necessary to make uh strong systems that are able to contain the agents that we deploy. Uh when you give them a lot of tools, those systems are very dynamic. So they can go and do things that you do not expect. So you need to have the right monitoring in place and the enterprises we work with, we give them those kind of monitoring systems. So uh I think we need to work toward of course having the right standards and making sure that uh when we deploy something in an enterprise they don't get surprised by agents going out of their of their systems but we need in Europe in order for us to have a say in how things are getting shaped. We need to produce the technology because otherwise we'll just be buying it and that's going to be we're going to end up in an extractive economy. So if we want to have a say in how things are governed and how things are safe and whether uh our agent systems are actually beneficial for us or or not beneficial, we absolutely need to say to be able to say look if you if you turn off uh the technology and if you cease to give it to us, well, we can still produce it.